Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1449

reference
99-tree-1
name
1449
tree-preservation-order

undefined

99-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006077 50.862302)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006006 50.862295,-1.006010 50.862309,-1.006019 50.862321,-1.006035 50.862331,-1.006054 50.862338,-1.006076 50.862340,-1.006098 50.862338,-1.006118 50.862332,-1.006134 50.862322,-1.006145 50.862310,-1.006148 50.862296,-1.006145 50.862282,-1.006135 50.862269,-1.006120 50.862259,-1.006100 50.862253,-1.006078 50.862250,-1.006056 50.862252,-1.006036 50.862259,-1.006020 50.862268,-1.006010 50.862281,-1.006006 50.862295)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL